Natural Rubber or Silicone Rubber?

Natural rubber or silicone rubber? In the world of lost wax casting, this question is hardly an academic one. The mold material chosen must be up to the task of turning a single original model into hundreds or even thousands of wax models for casting, and choosing the wrong material can lead to some serious hair-pulling in the casting department. There are actually three primary categories of rubber mold making materials.

5 Minute Read

This article was originally posted on Userblogs on 6/21/2016.
By Suzanne WadeMore from this author

Natural rubber or silicone rubber? In the world of lost wax casting, this question is hardly an academic one. The mold material chosen must be up to the task of turning a single original model into hundreds or even thousands of wax models for casting, and choosing the wrong material can lead to some serious hair-pulling in the casting department.

There are actually three primary categories of rubber mold making materials: natural rubber, vulcanizing silicone rubbers, and room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) rubbers, a non-shrinking, no-heat option. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, and as a result, each may be the best choice in certain situations. The key to choosing between them is to understand the properties of all three, and then decide which to use based on what qualities are most important for a given situation.

Au Nature

Natural rubber's advantages include high tear and tensile strength and a long shelf life. As the industry standard for decades, it's also a more familiar material to many mold makers.

Tensile strength is commonly measured by the number of pounds per square inch (psi) required to tear a standard sample. Natural rubber can withstand up to 3,000 to 3,500 psi, while silicone rubbers can handle 1,000 to 1,400 psi. RTVs are the most prone to tearing at 100 to 200 psi.

This greater tensile strength means that natural rubber molds normally last longer in production situations. While natural rubber molds may be used thousands of times before deteriorating, silicone molds typically withstand hundreds of uses, while some putty-type RTVs may be usable for only 10 to 30 waxes.

Because they have been in use for decades, natural rubber molds have been proven to remain usable for up to 50 years under ideal storage conditions. Although silicones may demonstrate similar staying power, their more recent introduction (in the 1970s) means their storability for long periods of time is relatively untested. RTVs can be less stable, because some are susceptible to moisture and will deteriorate more quickly if exposed to atmospheric humidity. (Pre-vulcanized shelf life for natural rubber and vulcanizing silicone rubbers is about the same at one year. RTV silicones are typically good for approximately six months.)

Although natural rubber was initially less expensive than silicones, the price of vulcanizing silicone rubber has dropped and the two are now nearly equal. RTVs, however, remain more expensive than either natural rubber or vulcanizing silicones.

The Silicone Story

Since its introduction to the jewelry industry, silicone has been making steady inroads into the mold maker's shop. The material's advantages include a higher-quality surface finish and easier release of wax models, as well as the availability of RTVs.

Because silicone rubber molds are self-lubricating, they don't require the use of spray release agents, reducing problems caused by the buildup of these agents on the molds. This property also makes it easier to release intricate, detailed designs from silicone rubber molds on the first try, versus the tinkering occasionally required to get the right amount of release agent in a natural rubber mold.

In addition, silicone rubber molds typically produce a shinier wax model, which can result in a higher-quality surface finish on cast items. And because silicone is relatively inert compared to natural rubber, it will not react with silver or with the copper in sterling, reducing the need for nickel or rhodium plating of the models. (Certain materials, such as some plastics, will inhibit curing of RTVs. In these cases, coating the model will frequently solve the problem.)

Some users find that silicone rubber holds its shape during wax injection better than natural rubber, making silicone more tolerant of variations in injection pressure. Also, silicone rubbers typically produce less flashing, since seals can be tighter.

Silicone's putty-like texture makes it easier to pack a mold, since there's no need to cut the rubber to size, and it is also easier to cut. In addition, different hardnesses of silicone rubber can be combined in a single mold and vulcanized together.

Silicone rubber's higher heat resistance makes it suitable for casting metals with melting points of less than 315°F (157 C), such as pewter and tin, directly into the mold. Silicone rubber also has a higher vulcanizing temperature than natural rubber -330°F (165 C) to 350°F (177 C), compared to 310°F (154 C) for natural rubber.

FYIs About RTVs

A third option for mold making is the non-shrinking, no-heat RTV rubber. These two-part mold material is typically mixed and poured around the model, then allowed to cure for 18 to 72 hours.

RTVs offer both advantages and disadvantages over traditional natural rubber and vulcanizing silicone molds. Room-temperature curing permits the molding of fragile materials that would be damaged by the pressure of a vulcanizer, such as hollow beads. RTVs also typically offer 0 percent shrinkage, compared to 0 to 4 percent for natural rubber and 2.6 to 3.6 percent for vulcanizing silicones. (This is a particularly crucial factor when the manufacturing process involves stone setting.)

Clear liquid RTV silicones also provide greater ease for inexperienced mold cutters, since the mold maker can see the model through the silicone rubber.

On the downside, RTVs usually have significantly longer curing times - hours or even days, compared to 45 minutes or less for natural rubber and vulcanizing silicone molds. They also offer the lowest tensile strengths of all the common mold materials, and require careful cutting and gentle use to avoid damaging the mold.

Many RTVs must be mixed in precise amounts, and the working time for the molds is often quite short at just a minute or two, although there are some RTVs that offer work times of up to 60 minutes. Most liquid RTVs require vacuuming to remove air bubbles, as well.

Whatever your choice for mold making, you'll need to use the right tools and techniques to get the best possible results. When cutting molds, be sure to use a sharp blade, and replace it immediately if it gets nicked or dull. Make sure that your hands are clean, and that the model has no visible defects.

If you are using a vulcanizer, double-check the accuracy of the vulcanizer's temperature gauge with a thermometer. Check each plate separately by placing a block of scrap wood into the vulcanizer, and sandwiching the thermometer first between the wood and the top plate, and then between the wood and the bottom plate. Observe the temperature variation through the vulcanizer's entire heating and cooling cycle.

And whatever mold material you use, be sure to follow the manufacturer's instructions precisely. While some materials are more forgiving than others for variations in process, all will offer better consistency and predictable results if you follow the steps the manufacturer has outlined for it.

So what type of rubber should you choose? The question doesn't have a single answer, and with technology improving all the time, the answer you come to today may not be the best one for tomorrow. Natural or silicone? The choice is yours.

This chapter was adapted from an article that originally appeared in the May 1998 AJM. Those industry experts who contributed their knowledge to it included Dominic Annetta, Steven Blythe, John Davidian, Elaine Corwin, Roger Greene, Michael Knight, Jeffrey Mathews, Lee Mosemiller, Bob Romanoff, Liz Rutherford, and Len Weiss

In association with

The award-winning Journal is published monthly by MJSA, the trade association for professional jewelry makers, designers, and related suppliers. It offers design ideas, fabrication and production techniques, bench tips, business and marketing insights, and trend and technology updates—the information crucial for business success. "More than other publications, MJSA Journal is oriented toward people like me: those trying to earn a living by designing and making jewelry," says Jim Binnion of James Binnion Metal Arts.

Click here to read our latest articles Click here to get a FREE four-month trial subscription.

You assume all responsibility and risk for the use of the safety resources available on or through this web page. The International Gem Society LLC does not assume any liability for the materials, information and opinions provided on, or available through, this web page. No advice or information provided by this website shall create any warranty. Reliance on such advice, information or the content of this web page is solely at your own risk, including without limitation any safety guidelines, resources or precautions, or any other information related to safety that may be available on or through this web page. The International Gem Society LLC disclaims any liability for injury, death or damages resulting from the use thereof.

Suzanne Wade

The All-In-One Jewelry Making Solution At Your Fingertips

When you join the Ganoksin community, you get the tools you need to take your work to the next level.

Become a Member

Trusted Jewelry Making Information & Techniques

Sign up to receive the latest articles, techniques, and inspirations with our free newsletter.