|
|
|||||||||
| |
The Gem and Jewelry World's Foremost Resource on The Internet. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
with MJSA Journal |
Product Testing Ultra-Vest MAXX Investment By Linus Drogs, 2005 |
||||||||
Editor's Note: AJM recently asked Linus Drogs of AU Enterprises in Berkley , Michigan , to test the new Ultra-Vest MAXX Investment from Ransom & Randolph in Maumee , Ohio . Designed to reduce the formation of gas porosity when casting white gold alloys, as well as provide smoother surfaces on castings made from resin rapid prototype model materials, Ultra-Vest MAXX is a reformulation of Ultra-Vest, the company's standard gold and silver casting investment. It promises to offer thermal stability under severe casting conditions. Drogs and his staff at AU Enterprises put the investment to the test in the shop. Their results follow.
The Setup The grids, plates, and trees were set up on standard rubber bases with 4 inch by 6 inch perforated flasks. We followed the investing procedure recommended by the manufacturer: an eight minute total working time and a 40/100 deionized water/powder ratio. Both the investment and the deionized water were at room temperature. The powder was added to the water in a vacuum investing machine with the flasks in the lower chamber. Mixing time was a full five minutes, plus two and a half minutes for pouring. There was no detectable difference in gloss-off times compared to the standard Ultra-Vest investment, but the Ultra-Vest MAXX seemed to mix slightly thicker. After a one hour bench set, the flasks were ready to be loaded into the oven for burnout. We used a 12 hour burnout schedule with a maximum temperature of 1,350°F/732°C held for four hours, and a one hour hold at casting temperature. The Cast After casting, the flasks were air-cooled for 20 minutes before quenching. De-vesting proved fast and efficient. The castings were water-pressure blasted to re-move 99 percent of the investment, and the remaining 1 percent was removed with the help of an ultrasonic. Finally, the castings were placed into a pickling solution for 20 minutes to remove the small amount of surface oxidation. The Results The Future Preliminary results show small downside risks associated with elevating the burnout temperature 100 degrees to 1,450°F/788°C. Since the binder in gypsum-based investments starts to break down at 1,350°F, any elevation of the burnout temperature above that point presents the risk of investment decomposition, which results in poor surfaces. However, it's essential to elevate the temperature to reduce ash residue. Our early data indicates that by elevating the burnout temperature to 1,450°F, we significantly reduced the ash residue from the rapid prototype models, and did not obtain surface defects that would have resulted from investment breakdown. It's important to note that our results are only preliminary and require extensive testing for validation. Further research in the area of casting rapid prototype models is ongoing. |
|||||||||
MJSA Journal, The Authority on Jewelry Manufacturing is devoted solely to the manufacture and sale of fine and fashion jewelry. No other publication devotes as many pages per month to new manufacturing techniques, bench tips, business and marketing strategies, and time-saving technologies. That's why our readers, from volume manufacturers to manufacturing retailers, custom designers to bench technicians, rely on MJSA Journal to Make It. |
|||||||||