The Ganoksin Project -  Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Techniques - Since 1996


Come and join your fellow jewelers on Facebook

Donate!
If you believe in what we're doing, you can help!
Orchid Message Archives
Re: [Orchid] Selecting power assisted hand engravers
-> Navigate by Topic: [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
-> Navigate by Date: [Message Prev] [Message Next]
-> Locate this message on the Date Tree or Thread Tree


leonid surpin Wednesday, June 01, 2011
   
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm  ]========

>     If you can use a powered graver to cut time without quality loss,
>     why wouldn't you use the powered tools. The only reason to make
>     your life harder would be for academic purposes, doing a
>     re-enactment of old methods for a demonstration. 

    One of the philosophers of antiquity ( don't remember who ) said
    that "truth shall be born of arguments". I think it was Plato. So
    here we are, arguing, presumably looking for truth. If that is what
    we are doing, than the search must be done in the right way, or the
    truth will never be found. 

    What is the right way, one may ask. The answer is avoiding logical
    fallacies, or the wrong conclusions will be reached. 

    In this argument about hand engraving versus and engraving by
    motorized tool, the false assumption is made that both methods
    produce the same result. They are not ! This fallacy stems from
    fundamental misunderstanding of what engraving is. 

    It is assumed that using graver in any capacity automatically
    qualifies as engraving. That is fallacy #2. Usage of tool, does not
    make on one a member the group of specialist using the same tool. For
    example: I have a surgical scalpel on my bench. Does it mean that I
    am a surgeon? Of course not. But somehow, it is assumed that if one
    uses graver to remove extraneous metal, such act qualifies him/her as
    an engraver. The truth is - it is not. 

    The fallacy #3 is that while is acknowledged there is a difference
    in the results, it is so small that nobody would care. This is over
    generalization. Some people would care a great deal. And some people
    would pay a great deal for that difference. When we discussing hand
    engraving, the connoisseurship cannot be discounted. 

    The fallacy #4 is the luddite label gets attached to proponents of
    hand engraving. This is double fallacy. Preference for traditional
    technique does not make one a luddite. The second part is that been a
    luddite does not make one automatically wrong. It appears that
    luddites were right about some things, or how one can explain growing
    popularity of organic farming, green movement, and etc... 

    I am sure that argument will go on, but let's try to stay way for
    from logical pitfalls. 

Leonid Surpin
www.studioarete.com

Click to Visit


Bookmark and Share Printer View Printer View
Navigate:
Orchid Resources:

 

Donate! If you believe in what we're doing, you can help!