| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] Unusual Busticated Diamond | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Peter W . Rowe Date: Sat Mar 01 19:11:32 2008 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== > It sounds like the lady hit the stone in a direction parallel to a > cleavage plane, and she hit it hard enough to cleave the stone. right, of course, Wayne. But the described break IS unusual in one important way. The direction of the cleavage plane in this stone was close to parallel to the table of the stone, meaning the stone was not oriented in the usual direction to the original diamond crystal. This usually means a mishapen rough, a macle, or something of that sort. Most of the time, the cleavage planes, which are paralell to the octagonal faces of the usual octagonal diamond crystals, run close to the pavilion angle, just a bit steeper than the pavilion facets, and blows to the crown can flake off a cleavage running girdle to culet. In this case, the cleavage plane is horizontal to the stone, which would require different impact directions to do. I've seen this sort of break mostly on small stones being pave set, where the forces in just seating the stones, or tighteing beads, can cleave stones oriented this way, but it doesn't seem common in larger stones. Among other things, the cleavage plane directions are not only the easiest to break, but they are also the hardest to polish, so cutters understandably try to avoid putting the table facet along a cleavage plane or too close to it... I agree with you that damage to the stone remains the responsibility of the owner, or whomever was handling the stone when it broke. But one should also keep in mind that perhaps, if it seems a given stone was unusually prone to damage, that some leeway might be in order in determining where the money to replace the stone can come from. This situation of course is hard to evaluate, since in all likelyhood, the stone did not present any obvious clues to it's unusual orientation, or the changed risks of breakage that might cause, so the jeweler cannot easily be held responsible in terms of selling a stone more likely to break (if that is even the case). But still... cheers Peter Rowe ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project