| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| [Orchid] Diamond cuts technicals | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: leonid surpin Date: Fri Jan 04 04:41:30 2008 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== Was: How to Tighten Princess Cut Diamonds? > I was under the impression that cuts like the princess, marquise, > pear, oval and the like were all modified brilliants, ie. designed > to maximise the return of light Tastes differ, so I respect your aesthetic preferences, but as far as technical of the cuts, only round brilliant is optimized for light return, the rest of the cuts were arrived at out of necessity. I realize that it may an old school, but for whatever it worth: Solitaire round larger then 2 carat looks obnoxious. If larger stone is desired than oval cut should be used and after 12 X 8 it is marquis to the rescue. Pears make nice earrings and pendants. I do not understand them as a ring stone. Cocktail rings are excepted from this discussion. But every sharp corner is a light leak and there is absolutely nothing that can be done. Princess has 4 of them and what makes it egregious that there is no need for it. Square shape does not harmonize with human hand. It would make hand look squarish which not complimentary to a woman, but may be o.k. for a man. If woman wears long fingernails, the ring with square stone would appear to cut the finger, not the preferred look. We very often forget that client is not the walking display of our skills. It is the other way around. Our skills should make the client look better. Compare round brilliant and princess side by side. One condition. Round brilliant should have table 53%, pavilion depth 43.5%, and crown height 16.2%. May take some effort to find it, but if you do, compare it to a princess, then you will know what I am talking about. My guess is that round cuts that you have encountered had very different proportions, and deviations from them result in degraded appearance. I even suggest that some of them were so badly mishandled that even princess looks good in comparison. Yes, I know that now it is more appropriate to talk about range of proportions instead of rigid standard. I say hogwash! When we listen to the music do we accept a range of a keys, or do we require an exact match? Leonid Surpin. ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project