| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] The Beilby Layer | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Dick Friesen Date: Sat Jul 07 02:54:42 2007 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== The Beilby Layer has pretty much been rejected for gem stones by the scientific community because of no adequate explanation of where there energy needed to satisfy the requirements for the molecular work function can come from, friction doesn't hack it. When the theory was originally proposed, work functions weren't understood, or known. The hydroxide arguments are known to be valid for glass but I know of no research that shows that it exists or would work on any other stone, glass has several properties that make it unique. Also heat, in general, isn't required for polishing. Although it is generated is many of the ways to polish gemstones. Think about the polish that can be attained by tumbling (by some people). Some work was done several years ago at Lawrence Livermore National Lab on polishing a ruby for a laser. The ruby had been ground to a specific shape using a computer controlled diamond grinder but there was no polishing step available at the time that would not have altered the shape. The ruby was polished by circulating a polishing compound in a liquid around the ruby, it wasn't fast, but the required polish was attained and no heat generated. I don't remember the polish or liquid. Work with electron microscopes mostly show the scratches on polished surfaces although there are exceptions. Add to that the fact that stones will begin to show a good polish long before the mathematical requirements for a polish are met and you are guarantied to be able to get more than one opinion on what is going on. Just to confuse the issue a little more, consider glass. I don't know what the scientific requirements would be for defining a liquid but for all practical purposes glass is a liquid. Electron microscope analyses has shown cerium oxide molecules under the surface of polished glass. The surface had to flow for that to occur. But as a liquid, the surface work function doesn't apply. But consider agate. Agate is a fibrous material, to get surface flow you not only have to get molecular motion, you also have to get molecular motion across fiber boundaries. I know of no adequate explanation of how this could occur, and since agate will polish very well with no heat applied at all, I will reject the surface flow theory until someone can demonstrate how and under what conditions it could work. Dick Friesen ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project