| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] The Beilby Layer | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: coralnut Date: Thu Jul 05 04:11:20 2007 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== Oh boy....Helen, you have opened a can of worms. I thought the last few messages on this subject might awaken the monster but....nothing significant appeared. Now, you have asked the single most debated question in the lapidary discipline. G. T. Beilby's hypothesis was documented in his paper, "Aggregation and Flow of Solids, Macmillian and Co, London, 1912! Since then a great deal of research has been done, especially in the late 1990's and early 2000s. The best and clearest description of the polishing process, of which the Beilby layer is part, are papers by Stephen W. Attaway, Ph.D in the 2003 timeframe. You may still find some of this information at the New Mexico Faceters Guild site at: www.attawaygems.com/NMFG/preston-equation.html. In several papers, he discusses Fracture Mechanics, Plastic flow, Plastic process zones, etc., and describes in some detail the theorys of - Finer Scratch Theory, Flow Theory, and Chemical Polish Theory. Beilby fell into the second. Further, Gerry Wykoff did some significant work on these theories, and in his, now defunct, American Gemcutter letters, stongely supports the latter of the three....describing polishing as an electrochemical process. HHMMm interesting to say the least. Supporting Dr. Attaway's research is work by Dr Scott R. Wilson, Ph.D whose papers are also available at the above site. I hope this gives you what you need to understand the process. Beilby's theory currently is not highly regarded though he is given recognition for a possibly a correct theory for the wrong reasons. I find that John Sinkankas doesn't even mention Beilby in his famous, Gem Cutting books describing polishing as a controversial subject on which few agree. On the other hand, Robert Webster gives some non-scientific explanations of it in his "Practical Gemmology", N.A.G. Press Ltd. London, 1978 reprint. Chances are you will never fine a truly scientific explanation of this theory other than in Beilby's original paper and that is, at best, a theory. Cheers from Don at The Charles Belle Studio in SOFL where simple elegance IS fine jewelry and where the July classes have commenced at the Boca Raton Museum of Art School!! ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project