| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| [Orchid] Argentium patent and patent application | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: john palmer Date: Sun Apr 01 07:36:29 2007 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== Hi all, Like so many others, I've been experimenting with argentium sterling silver, and I'm impressed with the way it works and with the tarnish resistance. However, I'm confused by the existing U.S. patent 6,168,071 issued to Peter Johns and by the current U.S. patent application 007000937, also submitted by Peter Johns. I'd like to know what other Orchidians think about my concerns. Regarding the patent: The '071 patent is titled: "Method for joining materials together by a diffusion process using silver/germanium alloys and a silver/germanium alloy for use in the method". The process, as described in the patent, could be the process that, on Orchid, has been referred to many times over the years as "fusing". I question the novelty of such a process. On the other hand, the process is said to take place at a temperature below the solidus temperature of either of the pieces being joined. My understanding is that the process at such temperatures is not one of diffusion, rather it is sintering. There is little or no diffusion involved in sintering. The former is atomic or molecular migration from higher concentration to lower concentration; whereas, the latter is either surface migration in the solid state, or it is surface evaporation/condenstion, from regions of high radius of curvature to regions of low radius of curvature. (I would expect surface migration to be the dominate mechanism for a silver alloy, because it has a low vapor pressure.) Sintering is not a new process, either. The possible implications of this patent have me in a quandry. Regarding the patent application: This application pertains to the compositions of the alloys. It apparently has received much critical evaluation from USPTO, since the first 19 claims have been rejected. Of the remaining claims, I was surprised by the possible implication of the claim that any item fabricated using any of the specified alloy compositions, without license approval from the assignee of the proposed patent (whom, I presume, is Mr. Johns since he is the assignee for the '071 patent), would be an infringement. I wonder how many people are aware of the possible consequences of this claim if it survives examination by USPTO. John Palmer Mackinac Designs ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project