| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] Use of turtle shells | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Ian W. Wright Date: Tue Oct 03 07:02:36 2006 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== This whole subject of 'conservation' as it relates to biological materials is a mess. For example, you could be in serious trouble for incorporating parts of Aunty Bessie's pet tortoise into jewellery after it has died and yet you could quite freely use Aunty Bessie's teeth, hair etc. in jewellery after her death and sell them on the open market if you want (e.g. as mourning jewellery). Tons of coral is dredged up every day, ostensibly quite legitimately, by fishermen who just throw it back - what are the chances of it surviving? virtually nil. Much of this coral together with that disturbed by storms is washed up on beaches around the world - who is to 'certify' that this is OK to use as it is 'ecologically collected' and has not caused avoidable harm to the environment. Similarly with turtles and other marine creatures - dead ones are often washed up and many island communities also rely on turtle meat as a food source. According to the law, the shells of these cannot be used as a materials resource as they are not 'certified'. It appears that to be certified, there has to be some planning of the collection of the material and the application of a quota system. So, almost by definition, this implies that the collection will involve killing live animals! The situation becomes even worse when you look at old material. I had some small pieces of ivory which I obtained twenty-odd years ago from the dusty back corner of a storeroom in an old cutlery factory which was being demolished and I occasionally used bits of this to replace missing escutcheons from around the locks on antique furniture. I know from discussions with people who worked at the factory that no new ivory had been bought in over 30 years so making this stuff at least 50 years old and probably older but this is only heresay and, since all the company's records were destroyed, I cannot prove it. So, should I have used it or what? I did so in the hope that, should it ever be questioned, there would be some expert somewhere that could date the material by scientific methods. But how would this apply to material which is, for instance, salvaged from old cutlery or broken antiques. By definition, anything on an antique should be old enough to pre-date the ecological restrictions but can you be sure that it hasn't been replaced or repaired with new material? The whole area of the restoration of antiques is fraught with difficulties - if the restoration is not carried out with materials which are identical to the original, the piece may become virtually unsaleable and will certainly have a much reduced value. Another consideration is - how can you trust the certification system? It is well known that, in some countries, the whole framework in which the certification originates is corrupt and probably more than 50% of the materials allowed onto the market 'legally' are, in fact, 'poached'. This particularly applies to exotic timbers and, whilst the dealers in western countries may do everything in their power to assure themselves that what they are buying and selling is 'ecologically correct', this is never certain. Even if they actually go to the seller's premises in Africa, the far East or wherever, they will only be shown what the seller wishes them to see! There is currently controversy on the China/Russian border where forests in Russia are being rapidly denuded by China's insatiable thirst for timber. It has apparently been shown recently that the agreed quotas are being totally ignored and that far more timber is being taken than is being documented leading to great ecological damage. It is difficult to educate rich purchasers not to want beautiful materials such as ivory and tortoiseshell but this is obviously key to reducing demand and hence reducing the supply chain. there should, however, be a way of making some material for repairs available legally which only exists as a result of the natural death of creatures or from justifiable food production. Ian Wright Sheffield UK ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project