| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] PMC in General | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: James Binnion Date: Tue Mar 15 22:47:22 2005 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== > A 31 gram package of Original Fine Silver PMC costs $32.50 USD > from Rio. You can compare that with the cost of sheet Fine Silver > yourself (it does vary, of course, but it never costs what PMC > costs weight for weight). What you are paying for with PMC is the > various ways that it can used and it's immediacy (see all the other > postings for all the other benefits). It is hard enough to make any money when selling silver jewelry due to the perception that " it is only silver" even though the labor involved is in most cases equivalent to that of other jewelry materials like gold or platinum. So when a company sells you silver at over 3 times the market rate it makes it even harder to justify using PMC for anything but your own amusement. There is nothing wrong with this but I find it hard to look at it as a "Professional" material. I am familiar with the cost of having silver powder made, I currently have about a kilo of it that I had atomized for some experiments I am working on. It is not very expensive to have the appropriate powder made and the binder is cheap so it comes down to Mitsubishi positioning it to sell into the hobbyist, enthusiast market which is not as price sensitive as the limited production or manufacturer markets. This marketing position is one of the reasons I have a hard time taking PMC seriously. > On another note: > Let me comment here on the negative postings re: PMC on this site. > New concepts are not always good concepts, but closing one's mind to > new concepts (like PMC), without fully exploring the benefits, > counters the very nature of the creative mind. Prejudice, in any > form, is a waste of human intelligence, energy and emotion. Bullying > via insult is coercive and nonproductive. I love learning new things, and I have been studying powder metallurgy for several years now because it is one of the few places to learn about diffusion bonding, the understanding of which is central to my work. So I have nothing against PMC because it is new. I am not certain if this is directed at me but whether it is or not I am not certain where the "Bullying" or "Prejudice" or "Insult" is in the conversation we have all been having about PMC . Are you saying that I cannot have an opinion that differs from yours without being a bully or prejudiced? I feel that my opinions on PMC are just as valid and legitimate as yours. > All of us jeweler/metalsmiths use whatever tools and materials > we need to create the end product...objets that are pleasing to us > and, hopefully, to others. PMC is JUST ONE OF THOSE TOOLS. It can > be used well. If it does not satisfy one's artistic vision at > first, there are two choices: (1) perhaps further exploration would > result in more expert and satisfying results; (2) it may not be a > suitable technique to reach one's goals. Just as a pitch bowl and > chasing tools do not deserve to be demeaned simply because the end > results might not be satisfying first time out, neither does metal > clay deserve that approach. A tool is a tool...and a poor > (uninformed/uneducated) craftsperson blames the tool for her/his > own inadequacies in it's use. Up until the last sentence I agree with this last paragraph. But just because I do not sing the praises of PMC doesn't mean that I am uninformed, uneducated or that my skills are inadequate. Many folks have found that they like PMC as a tool and that is wonderful. But just because you like it doesn't mean it does not have some significant issues with its use in jewelry making. Some like shrinkage can be dealt with by proper design and also have been addressed to a certain degree by the manufacturer with newer formulations of PMC. Some like its density and strength cannot be addressed without sintering dies and hot presses or other means of constraining the PMC during firing which are economically unfeasible for a studio metalsmith. And in my opinion Mitsubishi's pricing of the material is just too high for what it is. Jim Binnion James Binnion Metal Arts Phone (360) 756-6550 Toll Free (877) 408 7287 Fax (360) 756-2160 http://www.mokume-gane.com jbin AT mokume-gane.com Member of the Better Business Bureau ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project