| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] Disputing all opal cracks theory | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Derek Date: Sun Oct 10 19:38:02 2004 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== The reason I say that opal can crack when it's old and being repolished is that I've had it happen completely without explanation, even under sufficient water to keep it flushing. Upon father reflection I realized a couple of things. First that since opal that needs repolishing is more than likely a ring or bracelet stone that's been abraded through wear. It has by definition had a bit of a tough time of life or it wouldn't be scratched to begin with. That's the exact reason it needs repolishing. Had it not received rough wear, it wouldn't need repolishing. The other part of that is that when it needs repolishing, obviously it's because it's cloudy and you can't see through that cloudiness. It seems very possible that there are problems underneath that cloudiness that a person polishing wouldn't know about because you can't see through it until it's somewhat better polished or unless you wet it. Of course then the water gets into and fills the crack temporarily which is why you can see through the clouds. Then when it dries again, the crack might reappear but you can't see though it again. Even a tiny crack could cause a big problem. As all of us who have cut opal know, once a crack begins somewhere, it will sooner rather than later extend across the stone unless that part of the stone where the crack is is removed. Actually one question has always kind of struck me and is a little difficult to explain. Why is it when a small crack is removed from a stone the rest of the stone tends to stay stable but when the crack is left it seems to inevitably want to extend? The part of the stone that remains uncracked, or uncrazed if you will, should not seem to be affected by a crack that's not reached there whether you remove the crack of leave it. It's possible that a weakness or instability actually remains whether you've removed the crack or not. Incidentally, I believe it was Charles who made a distinction between cracking and crazing. To me that's a distinction without a difference. I know it is semantically the same, dictionary-wise. At least according to the Oxford English dictionary. I wonder what the difference in stone speak would be. Derek ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project