| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] Naming gem materials | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Peter W . Rowe Date: Sat Oct 09 19:45:28 2004 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== > Hi Peter, Well here you weren't so "startling" and have made a > few very good points, but firstly, you still confuse apples with > oranges: Maybe I'm mixing up your fruits, but I was replying to the rather blanket statements you made, which might have been in reply to discussions of bead materials, but which did not limit themselves thusly in your replies. Your post, to which this is a reply, is somewhat scrambled in terms of what seems to be my quoted statements, and what seems your reply, as much of what is unquoted is what I wrote, while many of your reply comments are in the quoted sections. So I've somewhat selectively edited your post for this reply, to isolate your comments, which I'll address. > Sure, "anything" is possible but with care, one CANNOT > 'scratch' ruby or sapphire-an unexpected fracture inside, or > inclusion, could cause trouble but a good look at the piece in > advance precluses that happening AND, you keep referring to set > (and obviously gem-grade) stones when this discussion was ONLY > about cheap bead minerals. Also, I've broken diamonds too-but not > scratched them True enough. My statement was that relying on a hardness test can be unreliable, especially for a beginner, since I assure you, it does NOT require an internal flaw in that ruby, for a graver or burnisher to leave what looks, even under a microscope, much like a scratch. Technically, of course, it is a series of crushed or bruised areas, rather than a true scratch, and does not mean the tool is harder. Just tougher. But as I said, ask any setter whether he or she can seriously damage a ruby or sapphire, even a flawless one or a perfectly clean cheap flame fusion one, with careless bezel setting. The damage really will look like a scratch, not a series of chips or anything. Any neophytes looking at that, could well assume that it's a scratch, and wonder if their tool is harder than the stone. The reason it happens, of course, is that though the stone is much harder than the steel, it's also rigid and somewhat brittle, while the steel is much tougher. The stone may blunt and deform the tool tip, but the tool tip can still exert pressure needed to cause the damage. This difference between hardness and toughness is part of what makes hardness testing problematic. True scratch testing requires a rather gentle deft touch. >> So didn't you say jade would resist that scratch? Jade, both >> nephrite and Jadeite, are both SOFTER than quartz. But they are >> tougher. You might have to press harder... if your steel will >> actually scratch the quartz, then the same steel will surely >> scratch jade. > Quite incorrect sir: jade, both nephrite and jadeite are tougher > AND harder-the best Samurai steel will not scratch any genuine jade > and will ALWAYS scratch quartz A fully hardened high carbon steel can indeed be harder than 7 on the mohs scale, though only barely. So a file, or the like, can sometimes with difficulty, scratch quartz. Most knife blades are not hardened quite this much, with about 5.5 to 6 being average, according to charts published by Sinkankas, and others. Nephrite, generally is generally listed as varying from 6 to 6.5, while jadeite is listed as 6.5 in Sinkankas's charts, and others. Individual specimens will very of course, and these may be close enough that given the much higher toughness of jade, can make comparing them with quartz difficult. Nevertheless, quartz is harder than jade in terms of just it's formal hardness specification. The actual ease with which you can scratch it varies a lot according to technique. But just try GENTLY drawing the point of a quartz crystal across any piece of jade you wish. You'll find you can leave a scratch on the jade, while drawing a sharp corner of the jade across the quartz crystal will not do the same. And just for fun, I just took a nice jadeite cab I've got, which already needs recutting due to a chip, and tried to scratch it with my old victorinox swiss army knife blade. Not samurai, of course, but rather more typical of what most knife wielders will have around. It leaves no mark on the jade, nor did it do a thing to a Brazilian agate cab. Turned over, and tried again on the unpolished undersides, both stones received a mark of steel rubbed off, just as gold would do on a touchstone, while neither stone itself was scratched. So much for "ALWAYS:". but of course, you did specify Samurai steel this time... Want to send me some to try? Not being a ninja lapidary, I don't happen to have that around to compare... > And never did I say that it was a "good......" proof, only that > CHEAP stones can easily be ID'd with sharp steel. OK. If that was stated in a post earlier than the one I replied to, I wasn't aware of it. Of course, the truth of this depends, still, on just which cheap stone one is talking about. You can get junk jadeite that is inexpensive and cheap because the color is crappy, but it can still be jadeite. Certainly, even a soft metal tool will easily damage those jade substitutes that are calcite or the like. no argument there. Those are the ones that "fizz"... > Yes, yes , but we're still merely discussing hardness testing-why > keep inserting additional factors. I often DO just 'smell' an > emerald, probably using some of your suggested acquired skills, but > I stll buy and sell jade regularly and, if in doubt, ALWAYS use the > scratch test-I'm usually in a jungle or mountain somewhere and WILL > alwaYS have my 'sophisticated' trusty 'moh/testing' equipment > along, call it a knife or whatever you will... I mentioned other tests because you said I suggested that one needed to pay big bucks to have those tests done. My point here was that it need not be that complex, and one even with visual observation, was already considering far more than hardness. I do not dispute, at all, your ability to reliably determine jade in the field. I can do it too, and I too, might sometimes check hardness on rough materials if I needed to. But your statement, without other qualifications, was that it was always all you ever needed, a suggestion that will have the retail buyers without other knowledge or experience trying to test everything green and jade like with their pocket knives, just as some of those same folks still insist that if that white cut stone scratches glass, it must be diamond (an old wives tale that even today is responsible for damage to any number of costly showcase glass tops, when customers surreptitiously scrape the diamond they're being shown across the showcase, just to be sure, unaware that a CZ might also scratch the glass, and a moissonite or white sapphire surely would. Had your posting, to which I replied, been worded even slightly differently, to suggest that all you USUALLY needed, was your hardness test, coupled with your experience, I'd not have had any objections. Try to remember that this list is read not just by the professionals, but by hobbyists and retail enthusiasts as well, who often will not have the experience to intelligently interpret a hardness test, or know when the results of such an attempt are meaningful. By the way, I did enjoy checking your web pages. Some nice work, sir. Thanks for sharing it with us. Peter Rowe ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2007, The Ganoksin
Project