The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet.
Re: [Orchid] Ultrasonic cleaner and damage to hands  
  [Thread Prev] [Message Prev]      [Date Index]   [Thread Index]      [Message Next] [Thread Next]
From: Bruce Holmgrain
Date: Mon Mar 08 01:42:09 2004
 
     
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm  ]========


>         Hello all, There is a HUGE difference between the frequencies
>     used by ultrasonic cleaners and ultrasound medical equipment. 

    No doubt. My point is that there is little, if any, evidence that
    ultrasonic cleaners used by most jewelers cause any long lasting, or
    even short lasting damage to tissue or bone. 

>         So he just reached in and fished the slices out. He did this
>     many, many times that night with the big ultrasonic tank on the
>     entire time. 

    Was this a typical jewelers ultrasonic? 

>             By the next morning he could not hold a pencil, his
>     fingertips hurt so badly. Basically, the doctor told him that the
>     sound waves had given him the most complete set of stress fractures
>     he'd ever seen. Not to mention the soft tissue damage -- the
>     pinkness and swelling was due to bleeding deep in the tissue. 

    How would we be privy to what "doctor told him"? 

>         Since the sound waves travel especially well in liquids, and
>     you are basically a liquid in a sack made of skin, you can see how
>     there is a potential problem here. 

    Not being a physicist, I would be more inclined to assume that most
    of our tissues behave more as a gel. Absorbing the kinetic energy and
    converting it to heat. 

>             As for the issue of tissue damage, check out the
>     "Guidelines for the Safe Use of Ultrasound, Part II -- Industrial
>     and Commercial" at the Canadian government's informative Consumer &
>     Clinical Radiation Protection site. Specifically:
>     www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/ccrpb/publication/safety_code24/toc.htm
>     Click on the "contact exposure" headings. They do mention the
>     scarcity of research on this topic. There has been one study with
>     volunteers, who did confirm that putting your fingers in a tank can
>     hurt. (I would suspect that there are ethics problems in pursuing
>     this further with human subjects.) The article says: "Contact
>     exposure can in some cases provide nearly 100% energy transfer to
>     tissue... 

    This is the beginning of a paragraph that addresses  ultrasonic
    humidifiers in particular. 

    The next couple of paragraphs, including the one which you cite
    below refer to devices operating in the "low  MHz frequency range"
    which, to the best of my knowledge is at least an order of magnitude
    above the operating range any ultrasonic cleaner that I have had
    experience with. 

>         For example, high-power ultrasonic waves are used in ultrasonic
>     cleaners and cell disintegrators because of their destructive and
>     violent effects. It is certainly reasonable to assume that
>     relatively intense cavitation activity occurs in the water (or
>     solvent) baths of such devices.... "The literature on devices such
>     as ultrasonic cleaners and tissue homogenizers is confusing: these
>     devices do not appear to be as hazardous as expected, given the
>     effects they were designed to create. Nonetheless, although reports
>     of biological effects are surprisingly rare, exposure to the
>     liquid-bourne ultrasound from these devices clearly can cause
>     tissue injury, and protection measures are necessary." 

    This paragraph is very confusing. It is very late and I wonder why
    it was written. 

    "Nonetheless, documented cases of actual tissue damage are rare. In
    one documented study, exposure to ultrasound in ultrasonic cleaners
    operating at frequencies between 20 and 40 kHz was reported to have
    caused pain in the hands of the volunteers." 

    I took my daughter climbing last night. She complained of hand pain.
    Does that mean anything other than her hands got a workout? Should I
    not allow her to climb anymore? 

    I found section 4 with "Guidelines for Safe Use" amusing. I am sure
    that these make sense with particularly large or powerful cleaners, I
    suspect that this section is not meant to apply to jewelers.


____________________________________________________________________
T h e   O r c h i d   L i s t
Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures
____________________________________________________________________
Orchid FAQ:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm
Orchid Archives:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive
Orchid Galleries:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm
Invite a Friend:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm
____________________________________________________________________
Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm
The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books
Buy Orchid Jewelry:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop
____________________________________________________________________
-Unsubscribe:
-Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank
____________________________________________________________________


  Click to Visit  
     
  Navigate:  
   
  Orchid Resources:  
   Join & Post
 Invite a friend to join Orchid
 F.A.Q
 Galleries
 BenchExchange
 Orchid Blogs
 Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index]

Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!

  1. My Yahoo - Do you have a My Yahoo page? If so, you can easily read the latest Orchid posts on your personalized page by adding this feed:Add Orchid to My Yahoo!
  2. Add Orchid to myGoogle Add to my Google
  3. Read Orchid with NewsGator and Microsoft Outlook Add Orchid to Your  NewsGator
Support Orchid! - If you believe in what we're doing, you can help!

 
     
     

© Copyright 1996 - 2009, The Ganoksin Project