| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] Handmade vs mass-produced | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: Neil George Date: Thu Nov 06 17:40:58 2003 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== Dale, I enjoyed reading your post and I will add to it if I may. The only thing I will dispute, is the comment made by Dr. Denayer in a previous post about the weakness of the dollar, which in reality and with respect, is incorrect. Here is the reason why. Because of a relatively strong Dollar, foreigners have been willing to lend massive amounts of money to Americans because of its currency strength, the high financial returns, and by an almost touching faith in the strength of America in itself. It is for this reason, that foreign governments such as Japan and China have been willing to hold our debt in order to make the dollar stronger so they can build their home industries with exports to America. Because American living standards and U.S. economic performance today depends heavily on the willingness of foreign investors to loan the U.S. economy money and the willingness of investors to keep their money here, is the key as to why the dollar's current strength is a clear sign that lenders still consider the United States creditworthy, and the primary reason why the dollar is so *strong*. A weak dollar, or a dollar decline, would end the consumption bubble. If the dollar took a dive today, we would be paying more for foreign goods, and we would no longer be able to pay for about one-third of these debts with paper IOUs as we do now. We will have to buy fewer or lower-quality goods. Therefore, as of today, the dollar is strong. A strong dollar could also be viewed as weakness, and the reasoning behind that comment, is that the strong dollar is making American exports too expensive in foreign markets, and foreign goods too cheap in U.S. markets. As a result, U.S. exports have been nose-diving in recent years, leading companies to lay off workers and hold back wage increases. And these individuals were once potential customers of ours. The broadest measure of foreign trade is by monitoring the "Current Account". This is the means that quantify what our export debt deficit is at any given moment. The current account is the difference between what we earn overseas (primarily sales of goods, sales of services, and earnings on our overseas investments) minus what foreigners earn here (primarily imports of goods, imports of services, and foreigners' earnings on their investments in the U.S.). If the current account is negative, we *cover* the *deficit* with *debt*. Therefore the dollar is strong, because more confidence is generated by the US than any other market on earth, therefore concluding to the fact that there is more financial holdings and debt held in the US by foreigners than the other way around as far as Imports and Exports are concerned, which is why it is in the interest of foreign governments to maintain a high dollar. They don't want product for the most part, they want to own interest bearing notes such as home mortgages, Treasury notes and bonds etc. Granted the cost of labour is a factor as is the exchange rate, but there are other criteria's to consider also. The United States repeatedly signs trade agreements that lower U.S. barriers to foreign goods but do nothing to open foreign markets (like the Andean and Caribbean Basin countries). It repeatedly signs trade agreements with countries manifestly too poor to be major markets for American products, but more than capable of becoming major exporters to the United States (like Mexico and China). It looks the other way when other countries artificially depress the values of their currencies to gain trade advantages (practically any East Asian country you can think of). And with only a few exceptions, it ignores foreign dumping, which means, that the sale of goods in a foreign country is set at a price below that charged in the home market, or below production costs, in order to boost export subsidizes directly or indirectly by many of America's trade partners. It harms the rival producers in the target country, which usually cannot afford to participate in loss-making ventures. Dumping is frequently the result of overcapacity in the industry in question. Further industry subsidies have adverse affects meaning that payments are made and aimed at encouraging increases in various types of behavior. Producer subsidies encourage producers to produce more; consumer subsidies encourage consumers to consume more; research subsidies encourage companies and individuals to perform more research. As long as this is, It could have been 10 times longer, but I will save it for another time :-). Best Regards. Neil George 954-572-5829 ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2007, The Ganoksin
Project