| |
|||
| The Gem and Jewelry World's foremost Resource on The Internet. |
| Re: [Orchid] 3Design Jewel | ||
|
[Thread Prev]
[Message Prev]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Message Next]
[Thread Next]
From: kgoeller Date: Sun Sep 28 23:52:18 2003 |
||
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ]======== Neil, I had, in reading your original post, assumed that you had simply left off the traditional "just a satisfied customer" tag to indicate that you had no connection to the company producing the product, and that your review was, therefore, unbiased. Your reply cleared that up, and I now understand that you are involved in marketing the product and possibly investing in it. That gives me a different take on your defense of it. At any rate, I think you seriously misconstrued my comments regarding the product's price. I am not knocking the product or its possible ability to improve some jewelers' productivity. However, the entry point for purchasing an initial license of roughly $5000 makes it unaffordable for many SMALL and INDEPENDENT designers and jewelers, even when that cost is amortized over years. Many of us have already made the investment in Rhino and Flamingo -- that cost included not only software, but computer platform to process efficiently, courses, and learning curve. Once that investment is made on a mental and fiscal basis, your argument must be much more compelling than the one stated to impel change that involves RElearning and REworking process as well as software. The true cost of change of this nature isn't the cost of the software -- it's the cost of the software combined with lost productivity while learning the new software, the "lost" cost of the old software if not fully amortized, the cost of transitioning existing designs and design libraries into the new software, time to spend on courses and tutorials to learn the new sofware, etc. In the software industry -- where I spent over 20 years before going full time with my jewelry work -- we knew that the hardest thing to do was to convert a customer (even a dissatisfied one) from a competitor's product. The argument made must be incredibly compelling and the customer had to see the COST of STAYING, rather than the cost of moving. Additionally, the price points had to be very carefully targeted to the demographic segment we were addressing within that market. If you are looking to convert small, independent artisan jewelers, I truly believe your price point is too high for MOST of us. On the other hand, if you are looking toward high-volume production jewelers, then you may be right on target. I believe that must be what you're targeting based on your statement that you cannot view this as a single-user entity. But if that's the case, the marketing materials (website) should clearly state that, which they do not. I applaud you and your company for looking "outside the box" and coming up with "pay for play" solutions and possible alliances with service bureaus. If you can get some of the better service bureaus to agree to make the investment, that will remove part of the barrier to entry for some. I have to tell you, though, that I was amused by the following quote: Yes home cooking like mama used to make, is all very nice and gives us all a warm feeling, but who has the time today to prep all of the required ingredients with just a knife. Been in a fine restaurant's kitchen lately? Prep is done with a knife almost exclusively -- knife skills are taught as a full semester course at cooking schools and a well-trained chef can outperform a food processor for just about any task. It's largely the less-experienced home user / hobbyist who relies on the productivity enhancing tools like the food processor. Extending that analogy to the software model, the functionality of 3Design would be more attractive to the hobbyist/casual designer rather than the professional. NOT that I think that's true -- just pointing out that the obvious isn't always what you think it is. Either way, you should re-think some of your approach to student licensing. What students in art school are exposed to and learn to use -- and to make "sing" -- is what they will leave that school with a powerful loyalty to. Right now, they are leaving those schools with good knowledge of Rhino/Flamingo. They are going to employers who are looking for expertise in Rhino/Flamingo, which they have installed and invested in. OR, they are going to smaller employers who are thinking about expanding into CAD... they become evangelists for the technology they know and influence the purchase of Rhino. One way to influence change is to start with the students. You do that with student/educator pricing that is attractive to the school community. You get the teachers to learn the product and they become your marketing tool, convincing the administration to invest in a lab license for a course they will teach on it. They attract students and teach them, then those students take the message of how great the software is out into the world. Viewing students as "competitors" simply because they have the same software available to them (albeit at a lower cost than you paid) is like Picasso worrying about students being able to get a discount on their oil paints and canvas at the local art store. It's not about the price of the software -- it's about what you bring to it in design sense and ability. I don't know of a single student who has the mature design sense and knowledge of engineering required to outdesign most of the members of this list... people like Sam Patania, Cynthia Eid, Trish MacAleer, Peter Rowe, and many others too numerous to name. Students are using the same equipment that these people are using, but don't have a mature vision that comes from living the art for a length of time. No software in the world will give them that... it only comes from experience and life.... it's something that I and many other aspire to. Respects, Karen Goeller kgoeller AT nolimitations.com No Limitations Designs www.nolimitations.com ____________________________________________________________________ T h e O r c h i d L i s t Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures ____________________________________________________________________ Orchid FAQ: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm Orchid Archives: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive Orchid Galleries: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm Invite a Friend: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm ____________________________________________________________________ Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books Buy Orchid Jewelry: ~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop ____________________________________________________________________ -Unsubscribe: -Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank ____________________________________________________________________ |
||
| Navigate: | ||
|
||
| Orchid Resources: | ||
|
Join & Post Invite a friend to join Orchid F.A.Q Galleries BenchExchange Orchid Message Archives [Subject Index] [Date Index] Ganoksin now offers a number of ways for you to stay on top of the latest from Orchid!
|
||
© Copyright 1996 - 2008, The Ganoksin
Project