The Ganoksin Project -  Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Techniques - Since 1996


Come and join your fellow jewelers on Facebook

Donate!
If you believe in what we're doing, you can help!
Orchid Message Archives
Re: [Orchid] The sign of a mature jeweler / designer
-> Navigate by Topic: [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
-> Navigate by Date: [Message Prev] [Message Next]
-> Locate this message on the Date Tree or Thread Tree


David L. Huffman Wednesday, November 07, 2001
   
========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm  ]========


    Hello Cte; Critics and Gallery owners have long used this criteria
    for determining if an artist had "met his stride" and was worthy of
    exhibiting, since they had no real understanding of what constitutes
    good art.  It's a pitfall of modernism.  Apparently, repetition was
    convincing.  On the other hand, if you look at artists with prolific
    careers, like Picasso, they have had many "styles" in their lifetime
    and generally didn't repeat themselves until they were old and had
    run out of ideas. . . .of course, I'm being facetious . . . Here's a
    better observance: 

    If you are going to present a body of work, wouldn't it make sense
    to get your viewer involved in seeing you have been developing and
    enjoying a particular level of understanding of your work and your
    life?  If you fill a space with a couple dozen pieces, each
    completely different, what are you giving your viewer?  Pretty
    things, and nothing personal.  If you want to see how it works, look
    up the work of the painter, Henri Mattisse.  You will see that often
    he did multiple paintings of a single subject, each one an
    abstraction on the previous one, until he had distilled what he
    chose to represent the essence of his subject.  His is one of the
    most explanatory examples of how an artist develops an idea.  If you
    prefer, listen to Glen Gould's "Enigma Variations".  It's another
    example of manipulating a form. One can't say whether an artist's
    work "should" or "shouldn't" be anything in particular (there's that
    pitfall of modernism again), but people will get the impression that
    you are a talented dilettante if you don't convey that there is more
    to what you do than immediately meets the eye.  Don't try to develop
    a "style".  Better to discipline yourself to making work in series.
    Styles are for art historians anyway. 

    David L. Huffman  



Click to Visit


Bookmark and Share Printer View Printer View
Navigate:
Orchid Resources:

 

Donate! If you believe in what we're doing, you can help!