[Jewelry making - Article 00601] - Re: [Orchid] Ancient gold granulation process

[Jarsink]

========[ Invite a Friend - http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm  ]========

    For 29 years I have studied, practiced and taught "granulation" so
    this discussion is right up my alley.  I certainly do not have all the
    answers but I do have some observations.  

    Today, we understand the word "granulation" to mean a process, but if
    we are to be truly correct, it refers to a type of surface decoration
    that is achieved by the use of small granules to create patterns or
    texture.  There are no records of how the ancients actually
    accomplished the attaching of those tiny bits of  metal to the base
    plates, so we all can theorize from our experience and exposure to
    books and museums, and the few historical clues that we do have.  One
    of those is the name of a copper bearing mineral, chrysocolla, which
    in Greek means gold (khrusos) glue (kolla), and which in ancient
    times  was used  in some of  the processes of attaching the gold
    granules.  From what I have read about the analysis of ancient
    examples, from many different cultures, more than one process was
    assumed from the examinations.  Silver was found in some sites, which
    seems more like soldering than "copper induction brazing".  So I think
    that it would be very difficult to separate granulation and
    soldering, and it is my opinion that many of the procedures
    accomplished today by soldering were accomplished then by the same
    process used for attaching the granules.  That process could not have
    been difficult, as there was so much produced that is so amazing. 
    There are still many things that I see but can not replicate, leading
    me to the conclusion that there must have been something in their
    process that we have not yet found, that is probably beyond our
    capability of seeing and understanding as we are of such a different
    time.   

    In the twentieth century, there have been several people who have
    redeveloped a process for attaching the granules and all of these are
    different and all work to some degree.  All of them are similar in
    that they use copper in the process, but it is introduced in various
    ways.  I prefer plating the granules and enriching the surface of the
    base.  I am able to obtain shiny surfaces on the base and delicate
    attachments of the granules.  And I like to use .014 granules for
    intricate patterning because they allow much more variety of patterns
    than even the .016 granules.  Of course, it would be uninteresting to
    use only one size, so I use all three commercial (actually four)
    sizes, depending on the project.  

    Speaking of commercial granules, that is definitely the way to go if
    you are doing any volume of work.  They are expensive, but they are
    all the same size and all round and the time I save  more than pays
    the extra charge (although the company that makes them has a monopoly
    and really charges more than I think is necessary).  For larger -
    over .032 - granules I make them by the paillions on charcoal method. 

    About the diffusion question, I frequently fuse structures, I always
    fuse bezels, I usually fuse the bezel to the back, that is, I do not
    add any copper.  I do not know if that is diffusion, but I am only
    using what is in the alloy.  Is this granulation?  I am using the
    copper in the alloy because I do not pickle the components, but when
    I fuse/granulate fine silver, I use nothing but heat.  

    After all my years of close association with this beautiful,
    mysterious technique, I have concluded that it is really easy, that
    it was always easy, and that the most important element for success,
    besides patience, is the control of the heat. 

    Did I clarify anything, or add to the confusion??  In any case, in my
    mind and work it is clear, very gratifying, very demanding, very
    challenging and ever-growing. 

    Incidentally, I read the article on granulation and amber when it
    came out and I decided to try to use it in the process in some way. 
    I ground an amber bead and experimented with the powder in various
    areas of the procedure.  It did nothing but contaminate the surface
    so that it got in the way of the process. I wrote to the author,
    hoping to get some clarification as to exactly how it had been used
    but I never received an answer.   And I have never seen it mentioned
    additionally anywhere until now, and this was questions, not answers. 
    So I have to assume that it was the speculation of  a scholar without
    practical experience. 

    Sorry I took so long to get into this.  I was out-of-town and away
    from a computer. 

Jean


____________________________________________________________________
T h e   O r c h i d   L i s t
Open Electronic Forum for Jewelry Manufacturing Methods and Procedures
____________________________________________________________________
Orchid FAQ:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/faq.htm
Orchid Archives:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive
Orchid Galleries:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/gallery.htm
Invite a Friend:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/invite.htm
____________________________________________________________________
Tips From The Jeweler's Bench - Article Archive
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/borisat/tip_sear.htm
The Jeweler's Selected Bibliography List
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/jewelry-books
Buy Orchid Jewelry:
~ http://www.ganoksin.com/shop
____________________________________________________________________
-Unsubscribe:
-Email: orchid-request AT ganoksin.com Body=unsubscribe subject=blank
____________________________________________________________________